SuperMotors SuperMotors SUPERMOTORS Search: try “orange Bronco on 35s”
Home/ Forums/ Car and Truck Make and Model Specific/ Mustang, Saleen, Roush/ 60s mustang

Mustang, Saleen, Roush

60s mustang

2 posts 2 contributors 7,353 views
JM

Josh MorrisOP

  • Member since Nov 2003
  • 2 posts
  • Winlock, WA, USA
Oct 7, 2004 at 8:33 PM
im looking to get a 60s mustang to build into a mussle car what is the one to have and why i wnat something that i can make stand and look like it is bad ass and then when i start it i want it to yell that it is a bad ass ride
DN

dnevins

Oct 23, 2026 at 10:41 AM
For a build that looks mean and sounds meaner, I'd point you at a 1967 or 1968 fastback.

Why: 1967 was the first big redesign, and Ford widened the front of the car to fit the 390 big-block, the first big-block ever offered in a Mustang. That extra room under the hood makes a 67-68 much easier to fit a big engine into (or a built small-block with headers) than a 65-66. And the fastback roofline is the look most people picture when they think of a 60s muscle Mustang.

A 1965-66 is lighter and the parts are everywhere, but the engine bay is tighter. The hot factory engine in those years was the K-code 289 Hi-Po, rated at 271 hp, so a well-built small-block suits that car nicely.

The ones that were muscle cars from the factory are the 428 Cobra Jet cars, the 1969 Mach 1, and the 1969 Boss 302 and Boss 429. Real ones bring serious money, so most people building a car start with a plain six-cylinder or 289 car and build it up, rather than cutting up a collectible.

Whichever year you pick, spend your money on the most solid, rust-free body you can find. Metal work eats a budget much faster than engine work, and a straight body is what makes it look the part.
Dana
Know the answer? Join free to reply. This community has answered Ford questions for 25 years, and threads like this one stay up to help the next owner. Join free